The Push, Pull and Mooring (PPM) model in Transportation

The Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) model is a theoretical framework that offers a comprehensive perspective on individual behavior in various contexts, including migration, consumer behavior, and technology adoption. By dissecting the model into its push, pull, and mooring factors, we gain insights into the multifaceted reasons behind individuals' decisions to adopt, continue, or discontinue the use of public transport systems.

The PPM model offers a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing public transportation usage. It underscores the importance of addressing not only the deterrents and attractors but also the situational factors that can anchor an individual's transportation choices. This comprehensive framework provides valuable insights for policymakers and transport authorities aiming to enhance public transport adoption and usage.

Push Factors

In the context of public transport, push effects are negative aspects or conditions of an individual's current situation that drive them away from their current mode of transportation. For instance, if someone primarily uses a personal car for daily commuting, push factors might include (Wang, Wang, & Yang, 2020):

• High Costs: Rising fuel prices, parking fees, and maintenance costs can push individuals to look for more affordable transportation alternatives.
• Traffic Congestion: Frequent traffic jams and the resulting delays can decrease the attractiveness of personal car use.
• Environmental Concerns: Awareness of the environmental impact of car use, such as pollution and carbon emissions, can motivate individuals to seek greener alternatives.

Pull Factors

Public transportation systems worldwide strive to present themselves as viable, attractive alternatives to personal vehicle use. The success of these systems in attracting users hinges on several key features, collectively known as pull effects. These features are designed to draw individuals towards using public transportation by offering advantages over other modes of travel. There are 2 families of factors for considering: Comfort and Convenience and Availability (TRB, 2013).

Comfort and Convenience

One of the most significant pull factors for public transportation is the level of comfort and convenience it offers. This encompasses several aspects:

• Passenger Loads: The appeal of transit is greatly affected by the availability of seating. Overcrowded vehicles, where passengers must stand for long durations, detract from the transit experience.
• Amenities at Transit Stops: The provision of amenities such as benches, shelters, and real-time transit information enhances the waiting experience for passengers.
• Reliability of Transit Service: Consistency in service, including on-time performance and regular headways, is crucial for commuter satisfaction and confidence in the system.
• Door-to-Door Travel Times: Efficient transit options that offer competitive total trip times, including transfers and waits, are attractive compared to personal vehicle use.
• Safety and Security: Passenger perceptions of safety and security at transit stops, aboard vehicles, and en route play a pivotal role in the choice of transit.
• Out-of-Pocket Costs: For many commuters, the direct costs of transit, such as fares or monthly passes, are significantly lower than the cumulative costs of fuel, maintenance, insurance, and parking for personal vehicles.

Availability

The ease with which passengers can access public transportation is a critical determinant of its use. Key considerations include:

• Proximity to Origin and Destination: The availability of transit options near both trip origins and destinations is fundamental. Literature suggests a 5-minute walking distance, or roughly 400 meters, as a standard measure of accessibility for urban transport. Improving pedestrian environments is crucial for encouraging walking. To extend the travel distance between homes and transit stops, promoting bicycle use is a beneficial strategy. For those looking to combine car use with transit, offering Park-and-Ride access is a vital step in linking these modes of transport seamlessly.
• Transit must be provided at the times required.
• Passengers must be able to find information on when and where transit service is provided and how to use transit. Without this information, potential passengers will not be able to use transit service.
• Sufficient capacity must be provided. A bus or train cannot be full when it arrives at a stop or at station.

Mooring Factors

Infrastructure quality, social norms, and government policies are identified as crucial mooring factors that can either facilitate or inhibit the transition towards public transport. Efficient, comfortable, and well-maintained facilities, along with supportive government policies, act as mooring factors that encourage the adoption of public transportation (Kang, Wang, Chen, & Su, 2021).

In conclusion, the PPM model presents a robust framework for understanding the complex interplay of factors influencing individuals' transportation choices. By focusing on push, pull, and mooring factors, it provides a structured approach to identifying and addressing the multifaceted challenges and opportunities within the public transportation system. Efforts to improve public transport adoption and usage must consider these factors holistically to create more attractive, efficient, and sustainable transportation options for all.

Policy Initiatives

Policy initiatives can significantly influence the dynamics of public transportation usage through the application of the Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) framework. By understanding and implementing targeted strategies within this framework, policymakers can effectively encourage the use of public transportation, making it a more attractive, convenient, and sustainable choice for the public.

Push Factors Initiatives

Policies designed to discourage the use of less sustainable or efficient transportation modes, such as personal cars, include:

• Congestion Charges: Imposing charges for driving in congested areas to discourage car use.
• Parking Management: Reducing parking availability and increasing fees.
• Fuel Taxes: Elevating fuel taxes to raise the cost of driving.
• Low Emission Zones: Restricting access to vehicles not meeting emission standards.
• Vehicle Quotas and License Plate Restrictions: Limiting vehicle registration or use during peak hours.

Pull Factors Initiatives

These initiatives aim to enhance the appeal of public transportation by improving accessibility, comfort, and convenience, such as:

• Subsidies and Reduced Fares: Offering reduced fare schemes to make public transport more affordable.
• Improved Service Quality: Investing in modern, clean, and comfortable vehicles.
• Increased Frequency and Coverage: Ensuring services are frequent and widespread.
• Integrated Services: Creating seamless connections between different transport modes.
• Technology Enhancements: Introducing real-time tracking systems and mobile apps for route planning.
• Environmental Initiatives: Highlighting the environmental benefits of public transportation.

Mooring Effects Initiatives

Addressing situational factors that can either facilitate or inhibit the transition towards public transportation includes:

• Infrastructure Development: Improving the accessibility and quality of public transport facilities.
• Public Awareness Campaigns: Conducting comprehensive information campaigns on the benefits of public transport.
• Workplace Incentives: Encouraging employers to offer public transport benefits.
• Urban Planning: Prioritizing public transport, walking, and cycling in urban development.
• Legislative Support: Supporting the expansion and improvement of public transport services through laws.

The effectiveness of these policy initiatives in promoting public transportation usage is supported by research findings that emphasize the importance of addressing push, pull, and mooring factors to influence individual transportation choices. For instance, the study by Wang, Wang, and Yang (2020) highlights how push factors like environmental threats and perceived inconvenience can drive individuals away from private cars towards greener transport options, with pull factors such as green transport policies and a better transport system attracting them to make the switch. Furthermore, the mooring factor of inertia can either hinder or facilitate the shift towards public transportation, indicating the complex interplay of factors that influence public transportation usage (Wang, Wang, & Yang, 2020).

By strategically implementing policy initiatives that target these push, pull, and mooring factors, policymakers can effectively enhance the attractiveness and convenience of public transportation, contributing to a more sustainable and efficient transportation system.

Potential impacts and issues with a focus mainly on push factors

The potential impacts of push factors on public transportation, underscore the importance of policy interventions to encourage sustainable urban mobility. Push factors, such as higher fuel taxes, congestion charges, and restricted parking, can significantly reduce car use, offering environmental benefits and increased revenue for public transportation improvements. However, these initiatives also face challenges such as public resistance, limited effectiveness without complementary pull factors, economic and social impacts, and a potential surge in informal transportation modes (Wang, Wang, and Yang, 2020).

Potential Impacts of Push Factors

• Reduced Car Use: Implementing push factors in urban areas can lead to a decrease in private car use, potentially increasing public transportation usage as an immediate alternative.
• Environmental Benefits: Reduced car use can lower traffic congestion and emissions, contributing to better air quality in cities.
• Increased Revenue: Funds collected from taxes and fees associated with push factors can support the development and maintenance of public transportation infrastructure and services.

Challenges and Limitations

• Public Resistance: Push factors might be unpopular among the public if they perceive these measures as punitive without providing viable transportation alternatives.
• Limited Effectiveness Without Pull Factors: The effectiveness of push factors in sustaining a long-term modal shift to public transportation is limited if the system remains unreliable or inaccessible.
• Economic and Social Impacts: Higher costs associated with car use can disproportionately affect lower-income groups, leading to social equity concerns.
• Informal Transportation Surge: In regions where informal transport modes are prevalent, push factors might inadvertently increase reliance on these unregulated services without improving public transport.

The Need for a Balanced Approach

For a sustainable increase in public transportation's share, it is essential to combine push factors with pull factors—enhancing the reliability, coverage, safety, and comfort of public transportation. This dual strategy addresses the challenges and ensures a more effective shift towards sustainable urban mobility.

In summary, while push factors can provide a temporary boost to public transportation usage, their long-term success hinges on simultaneous improvements in the public transport system. A holistic approach that includes both push and pull factors is crucial for achieving sustainable urban mobility.

Aplying both pull and push factors

Applying both push and pull factors is a widely recognized and effective strategy for enhancing the mode share of public transportation. This balanced approach ensures that while discouraging the use of less sustainable or inefficient transportation options through push factors, there is a simultaneous enhancement of the attractiveness and quality of public transport through pull factors.

Immediate Alternatives

Implementing pull factors alongside push factors provides individuals with an attractive, reliable, and convenient alternative to private vehicles or other less sustainable modes of transport. This is crucial because without viable alternatives, push factors alone might lead to public resistance or a shift to other forms of transport that do not alleviate congestion, emissions, or urban mobility challenges (Xia et al., 2017).

Synergistic Effects

Pull and push factors can have synergistic effects, wherein the combination of both can more effectively shift travel behavior than either strategy alone. For instance, congestion pricing (a push factor) paired with improvements in public transport services (a pull factor) offers a compelling alternative to driving, especially during peak hours (Wang, Wang, & Yang, 2020).

Reducing Negative Perceptions

Introducing pull factors first or simultaneously with push factors can help mitigate negative perceptions of the latter. If the public sees improvements in the public transport system, they may be more receptive to measures designed to discourage car use. This approach also demonstrates a government’s commitment to providing equitable, efficient transportation options (Piper & Naghshpour, 2014).

Social and Economic Equity

Ensuring the public transport system is accessible and equitable before implementing push factors that make private vehicle use more expensive or inconvenient is crucial. This is particularly important in cities where lower-income populations might rely on affordable transport options. Without ensuring public transport viability for all society segments, push factors could disproportionately affect those less able to absorb added costs or inconveniences (Xia et al., 2017).

Long-Term Sustainability

For the shift towards public transport to be sustainable in the long term, it’s essential that people choose it because it is genuinely a better option, not just because other options are worse. This necessitates investment in and attention to pull factors that make public transport an attractive choice (Wang, Wang, & Yang, 2020).

In summary, the most effective and sustainable approach to increasing public transport usage involves applying both push and pull factors simultaneously. This ensures a balanced strategy that encourages the use of public transport and discourages reliance on less sustainable modes, facilitating smoother transition and greater public acceptance.

The effectiveness of such balanced strategies is supported by research that emphasizes the importance of improving public awareness of traffic problems and perceived benefits of sustainable transport as potential strategies to reduce car use, highlighting the significant role that both push and pull factors play in shaping transportation choices (Xia, Zhang, Braunack-Mayer, & Crabb, 2017).

Challenges when implementing push factors

Implementing push factors to encourage the shift from private vehicle usage to public transport involves navigating several significant challenges, stemming from socio-economic diversity, urban planning complexities, existing public transport infrastructure issues, cultural attitudes, and political considerations.

Public Resistance

Affordability and Dependence: Many individuals find private vehicles to be cost-effective and reliable. Introducing push factors that make these options more costly or inconvenient could face significant public pushback unless affordable and efficient alternatives are provided.

Cultural Perceptions: The status and personal freedom associated with private vehicle ownership might make policies perceived as restrictive quite unpopular (Singh, Chaudhary and Malik, 2022).

Infrastructure Limitations

Inadequate Public Transport: Many cities lack a comprehensive, reliable, and efficient public transport system. Without viable alternatives, push factors might worsen transportation challenges.

Urban Sprawl: The dependency on personal vehicles in sprawling cities complicates the shift to public transport due to longer travel distances (Ghate and Qamar, 2020).

Economic Implications

Impact on Low-income Groups: Increased transportation costs through push factors like congestion charges or parking fees could disproportionately affect those with lower incomes.

Economic Burden: The broader economic implications of increased transportation costs could affect the cost of goods and, by extension, their market prices (Ahmad and Oliveira, 2016).

Political Will and Governance

Multi-Agency Coordination: Successful implementation requires collaboration across different levels of government and agencies, a complex and often challenging endeavor.

Political Risks: The potential for public resistance might deter politicians from implementing unpopular measures, especially close to elections (Sharma, 2014).

Technological and Data Constraints

Lack of Data for Planning: Effective planning and implementation of push factors necessitate detailed traffic, public transport usage, and urban mobility data, which may be lacking.

Technology Integration: The need for significant investment in technology to support smart transportation solutions presents a considerable challenge (John, Sivaraj, & Mugelan, 2018).

Legal and Regulatory Challenges

Legislative Framework: New laws or amendments to existing ones may be needed, a process that can be protracted and fraught with legal complexities.

Enforcement: Ensuring compliance with new regulations requires effective enforcement mechanisms, which can be resource-intensive (Sinha, 2021).

Strategies to overcome challenges

Addressing these challenges requires a balanced approach, careful planning, and strong political will to invest in long-term, sustainable urban mobility solutions. Following we can find a list of strategies.

• Public Participation: Engaging with the community to understand concerns and adjust policies accordingly.
• Phased Implementation: Introducing push factors gradually, using pilot projects to allow for real-world feedback.
• Public Transport Investment: Enhancing public transport systems to provide viable alternatives is crucial.
• Targeted Exemptions and Subsidies: Policies should account for socio-economic diversity, including exemptions for those most affected.
• Leveraging Technology: Smart technologies can improve traffic management and public transport, facilitating a smoother transition.

Conclusion

The implementation of push factors to promote the transition from private vehicle use to public transport presents several notable challenges across socio-economic, urban planning, cultural, political, and technological domains. Despite the recognized benefits of encouraging public transport use, such measures can provoke public resistance due to perceived affordability issues, cultural values associated with private vehicle ownership, and the potential economic burden on low-income groups. Urban planning complexities, such as inadequate public transport infrastructure and the challenges posed by urban sprawl, further complicate the effective application of push factors. Moreover, the endeavor requires a coordinated effort across various government levels and agencies, which is often hindered by political risks and a lack of necessary data for informed decision-making.

Legal and regulatory challenges, including the need for new legislation and effective enforcement mechanisms, add another layer of complexity to the implementation of push strategies. The potential for increased transportation costs to impact broader economic factors, such as the cost of goods, underscores the need for a carefully considered approach that mitigates adverse impacts on the most vulnerable segments of society.

To navigate these challenges, a multifaceted approach that includes public participation, phased implementation, targeted exemptions and subsidies, and leveraging technology for smarter transportation solutions is critical. Investing in public transport infrastructure to provide attractive, reliable, and efficient alternatives to private vehicle use is paramount. Engaging with the community to understand and address concerns, alongside gradual implementation with real-world feedback, can help to mitigate public resistance and ensure the acceptance of push measures. Furthermore, policies must be designed with socio-economic diversity in mind, offering exemptions or subsidies where necessary to ensure equitable access to transportation options.

The successful implementation of push factors in promoting public transport usage hinges on a balanced strategy that is sensitive to the challenges and complexities of urban mobility. It requires careful planning, strong political will, and a commitment to long-term, sustainable solutions that prioritize equitable access to transportation for all segments of the population.

References

Ahmad, S., & Oliveira, J. A. P. (2016). Determinants of urban mobility in India: Lessons for promoting sustainable and inclusive urban transportation in developing countries. Transport Policy.

Chang, H., Wong, K. H., & Li, S. Y. (2017). Applying push-pull-mooring to investigate channel switching behaviors: M-shopping self-efficacy and switching costs as moderators. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 24, 50-67.

Ghate, A. T., & Qamar, S. (2020). Carbon footprint of urban public transport systems in Indian cities. Case studies on transport policy.

John, S. K., Sivaraj, D., & Mugelan, R. K. (2018). Implementation Challenges and Opportunities of Smart City and Intelligent Transport Systems in India. Intelligent Systems Reference Library.

Kang, K., Wang, T., Chen, S., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Push-Pull-Mooring Analysis of Massive Open Online Courses and College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

Piper, W., & Naghshpour, S. (2014). Government technology transfer: the effective use of both push and pull marketing strategies. International Journal of Technology Management, 12, 85.

Sharma, J. (2014). Public-Private Partnership in Public Transportation. The MA Journal.

Singh, J., Chaudhary, H. K., & Malik, A. (2022). A Review on India's Urban Transportation. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology.

Sinha, M. (2021). Harnessing land value capture: Perspectives from India’s urban rail corridors. Land Use Policy.

Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2013). Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Third Edition. (TCQSM).

Wang, S., Wang, J., & Yang, F. (2020). From willingness to action: Do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation? Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 79, 102242.

Xia, T., Zhang, Y., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Crabb, S. (2017). Public attitudes toward encouraging sustainable transportation: An Australian case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(8), 593-601.