TRB in 2013 write that the 2 main service factors are availability and comfort and convenience. In this article we will cover the comfort and convenience.
Some of the more important factors that affect transit comfort and convenience are the following:
These factors can be summarized as:
Unlike the first decision—whether transit is an option for the trip—the questions listed above are not necessarily all-or-nothing. People have their own personal values that they apply to a given question, and each person will weigh the answers to these questions differently. Regular transit users familiar with the service may perceive transit service more favorably than non-users. In the end, the choice to use transit will depend on the availability of other modes and how the quality of transit service compares with that of competing modes.
Passenger Loads
Transit is less attractive when passengers must stand for long periods of time, especially when transit vehicles are highly crowded. When passengers must stand, it becomes difficult for them to use their travel time productively, which eliminates a potential advantage of transit over the private automobile. Most transit agencies assess the degree of passenger crowding on a transit vehicle based on the occupancy of the vehicle relative to the number of seats, expressed as a load factor. In general, transit provides load factors at or below 1.0. Inner-city rail service may approach 2.0 or even more.
Measuring loading by the number of passengers per unit vehicle length is often more appropriate for rail capacity calculations than using a load factor.
Reliability
Reliability affects the amount of time passengers must wait at a transit stop for a transit vehicle to arrive, as well as the consistency of a passenger’s arrival time at a destination from day to day. Reliability also affects a passenger’s total trip time.
Reliability encompasses both on-time performance and the regularity of headways between successive transit vehicles.
Reliability is influenced by a number of factors, some under the control of transit operators and some not. These factors include:
Travel time
A longer trip by transit than by automobile may be seen by passengers as being less convenient; this may be mitigated somewhat if the on-board transit time can be used productively where the in-car time would not be.
Total trip time includes the travel time from one’s origin to a transit stop, waiting time for a transit vehicle, travel time on-board a vehicle, travel time from a transit stop to one’s destination, and any time required for transfers between routes during the trip. The importance of each of these factors varies from person to person. Some persons will view the trip as an opportunity for exercise during the walk to transit and for catching up on reading or work while aboard a vehicle. Other persons will compare the overall door-to-door travel time of a trip by transit with the time for the same trip by private automobile.
Transfers
Requiring transfers can make service more efficient for operators, but can be less convenient for passengers, depending on the circumstances, since is well when the new route that the passengers transfer to offers a net time savings or service frequency improvements. Usually, transfers adds to a passenger’s total trip time and raise the possibility that a missed connection will occur, which would increase the length of a passenger’s trip by the amount of one headway. Transfers also increase the complexity of a transit trip to first-time passengers.
Passengers perceive the passage of time differently for each portion of their trip. In average, walk time is 2,2 x in-vehicle time, wait time is 2,1 x in-vhicle time and transfer time is 2.5 x in-vehicle time.
Some studies have also identified a transfer penalty in addition to the higher importance of transfer time relative to in-vehicle time. Reported transfer penalties are typically in the range of 12 to 17 minutes.
Safety and Security
Safety includes the potential for being involved in a crash, as well as slips and falls while negotiating stairs or other elements of the transit system. Security covers both the real and perceived chance of being the victim of a crime while using transit. It also covers irritants, such as encountering unruly passengers on a regular basis or having to listen to someone else’s radio/phone.
Cost
Potential passengers weigh the cost and value of using transit versus the out-of-pocket costs and value of using other modes. Out-of-pocket transit costs consist of the cost of the fare for each trip or the cost of a monthly pass (and possibly the cost of parking at a station), while out-of-pocket automobile costs include road and bridge tolls and parking charges. Other automobile costs, such as fuel, maintenance, insurance, taxes, and the cost of buying an automobile generally do not occur for individual trips and thus usually do not enter into a person’s consideration for a particular trip.
Appearance and Comfort
Having clean, attractive transit stops, stations, and vehicles improves transit’s image, even among non-riders. On the other hand, a dirty or vandalized shelter or vehicle can raise questions in the minds of non-users about the comfort and quality of transit service, and about other aspects of the service, such as maintenance, that may not be as obvious.
Passengers are also interested in personal comfort while using transit, including
Transportation Research Board (TRB), 2013. Transit Capacity and Quality Service Manual, Third Edition. (TCQSM).
Málaga, Spain